Journal of Integrated Care Pathways > Volume 12, Number 2 > Pp. 67-73

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hargreaves, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Opinion

Collaboration across primary and secondary care dermatology services

Simon Hargreaves 

Mill Street Medical Centre, St Helens, UK

Email: simonandkate2000{at}yahoo.co.uk

Purpose: The paper demonstrates the complexities of leadership in a local health-care community across primary and secondary care interface, using the example of a general practitioner (GP) with a special interest role (GPwSI) in dermatology. It focuses on how the service will develop and how it could be achieved. Design: Various models and theories about change management were consulted focusing particularly on the goals of the local health-care economy, resources available and environment/contextual surroundings. Practical implications: Primary care trusts (PCTs), acute trusts and clinicians need to work collaboratively to achieve an integrated, flexible care pathway, so that patients and the PCTs can be assured of an efficient and good quality service. Conflicts between primary and secondary care dermatology services are not sustainable for a long period. Originality: The Government's agenda is a shift of care closer to people's homes, so PCTs do need to be aware of what they wish to commission, and consider moving traditional hospital-based facilities into community settings, such as walk-in centres, polyclinics and large health centres, associated with improved GP and patient education on skin problems.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?