Journal of Integrated Care Pathways > Volume 13, Number 1 > Pp. 23-29

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hall, J. Articles by Callaghan, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Original articles

Part 2: The organization of mental health care. Contrasting prevailing approaches with integrated care pathways – integrated care pathways, the care programme approach and clinical guidelines

Julie Hall ^*  and Patrick Callaghan 

^* Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Rampton Hospital, Retford, Nottinghamshire, UK; University of Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Duncan Mcmillan House, Nottingham, UK

Correspondence to: JH Email: julie.hall{at}nottshc.nhs.uk

This paper is the second in a series of two which contrasts the various approaches to managing mental health care with integrated care pathways (ICPs). As outlined in Part 1, over the last decade, ICPs have become commonly used to manage the patient journey for people with mental health problems. This paper specifically considers how ICPs relate to and impact upon the implementation of the care programme approach and use of clinical guidelines in mental health care. Underpinning the discussion is a recent literature review conducted using a systematic approach. The discussion which follows gives a critique of care pathway development, and perspectives on choice and indivdualised care. The conclusions suggest that progress is being made towards incorporating individualised care and choice for service users within the structures of mental health ICPs. The literature outlines that as an approach to managing care ICPs have gone beyond traditional approaches to implementing clinical guidelines and case management, with potential to enable the best possible opportunities and outcomes for service users and carers. To ensure this kind of success, the ICP development process, clinical engagement, involvement and ICP content are obvious critical factors.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?